Recent Episodes
-
Law Talk 2.0
Apr 11, 2025 – 56:11 -
Immunity Idols and Chevrons
Jul 3, 2024 – 52:01 -
Tips For Everyone: A Supreme Court Roundabout
Jun 25, 2024 – 57:58 -
The Professors Strike Back: The 1st Amendment on Campus, ICC's Overreach, and Presidential Immunity
May 3, 2024 – 50:50 -
Trump Trials and Tribulations
Mar 29, 2024 – 58:04 -
Social Media, IVF, Trump, and the Politics of Disgorgement
Mar 1, 2024 – 59:08 -
West Coast, Best Coast
Jan 26, 2024 – 01:10:13 -
All Enemies, Foreign and Domestic
Dec 1, 2023 – 50:41 -
The Law of War
Oct 19, 2023 – 01:03:56 -
Question Time!
Sep 22, 2023 – 01:11:03 -
Indictments: Infinity War
Aug 16, 2023 – 01:07:09 -
SCOTUS Wrap-up 2023
Jun 30, 2023 – 01:03:15 -
The Peruvian Robes
May 18, 2023 – 01:02:22 -
The Fertile Octogenarian
Apr 20, 2023 – 01:08:59 -
Nothing To Bragg About: Epstein & Yoo On Manhattan DA’s Trump Indictment
Apr 5, 2023 – 42:19 -
Big Men on Campus
Mar 17, 2023 – 59:54 -
(Ex)Presidents’ Day
Feb 25, 2023 – 59:52 -
Little Green Corvette
Jan 21, 2023 – 57:45 -
Live At The Federalist Society
Nov 15, 2022 – 51:53 -
The Girl With the Curl
Sep 6, 2022 – 01:04:34 -
“The End of Roe v. Wade”
Jun 27, 2022 – 01:00:25 -
The Leak Heard ‘Round the World
May 4, 2022 – 30:33 -
The Life of the Snail Darter
Apr 25, 2022 – 01:13:57 -
California Dreamin’
Jan 22, 2022 – 59:36 -
Santa on Trial
Dec 14, 2021 – 01:00:47 -
Worked Up Into a Blue Snit
Nov 3, 2021 – 01:06:51 -
Ask the Professors!
Sep 24, 2021 – 01:01:26 -
Impeachable Offenses
Aug 10, 2021 – 01:03:07 -
While the Iron is Hot
Jun 24, 2021 – 57:40 -
Marbury, Madison … and Yoo?
May 28, 2021 – 59:46 -
Guns, Cheerleaders, and Polygamy
Apr 30, 2021 – 01:03:26 -
The Housewarming Party
Mar 27, 2021 – 01:01:50 -
Tenth
Feb 27, 2021 – 01:07:54 -
Law Talk and Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson: Live
Jan 28, 2021 – 02:44 -
What We Saw at the Revolution
Jan 9, 2021 – 01:14:09 -
Eating a McRib in Evening Dress
Dec 9, 2020 – 59:47 -
Stale Emergencies
Nov 24, 2020 – 01:03:21 -
Judging Amy
Oct 31, 2020 – 01:03:47 -
Supreme Court: Ragnarok
Sep 23, 2020 – 01:03:16 -
Epstein, Yoo, & You
Aug 27, 2020 – 01:09:43 -
Stone’s Rules
Jul 14, 2020 – 01:18:21 -
Give Me the Epstein!
Jun 17, 2020 – 01:01:45 -
A Race to the Bottom
May 13, 2020 – 01:09:21 -
Rise of the Micro-Tyrant
Apr 16, 2020 – 01:00:02 -
Lawyers in Lockdown
Mar 26, 2020 – 59:18 -
Quarantined!
Mar 12, 2020 – 01:00:51 -
Best Supporting Lawyer
Feb 13, 2020 – 01:01:38 -
The Bottle Episode
Jan 18, 2020 – 57:43 -
Check Your (Executive) Privilege
Dec 12, 2019 – 58:18 -
Nothing Is Benign
Nov 18, 2019 – 51:43
Recent Reviews
-
Mikeat4112Thank goodness for Epstein…but what happened?Enjoy this podcast a great deal, but I come close to turning it off when Yoo is talking. Yoo is no intellectual slouch, but you have to be pretty smart and education sometimes to lack basic common sense and perspective. Thank goodness that Epstein brings it all to the table. Edit: new podcast had me see this exactly opposite! Epstein‘s disgust with Trump has him taking positions that I don’t think he would otherwise take (more judicial scrutiny because …Trump? Let’s make the courts even more political), and Yoo is reasonable. Who knew?
-
Janney USA2.0 the bestLove the addition of Charles CW Cooke. All very engaging and educational. Wish they could do this weekly.
-
The UngeratorEpstein TDSI hope he can mitigate his rhetoric or this podcast will quickly become difficult to enjoy
-
AZ JPalNow we’re Cookeing!How wonderful to hear Charlie as the new host! An extraordinarily smart podcast has just leveled up.
-
NotFromTheIEListening on 4 July 2024 drinking a beerLong time listener, first time caller. What a week to have a speaker of the King’s English to host. Fantastic. Based Roman Jurist and kimchi at Thanksgiving loving Philly born Berkeley Law Prof continue to dominate the Law Talk.
-
Michele listening in PaWell over 800 views!I stopped the latest podcast to listen to Richard's lecture at the Federalist Society. John sold it short, over 2000 views to date and absolutely worth it to see Richard fidget with his mask in annoyance! 🤣
-
HairbrainI wish I had you guys as professors when I was in law schoolExcellent talk and debate on the law and how real lawyers think thank you
-
justinchinaSmart people who can’t escape being obtuseI wish they would try occasionally to understand and impartially explain both sides, rather than just sitting and regurgitating the same old talking points and proving themselves to be staunch lock-step conservatives. I would love smart legal minds who can do actual justice to the system, rather than just stating opinions with the assumption of moral and obvious superiority of their own ideas.
-
EricNMaDebate, laugh and wisdomIt is so joyful to listen Richard and John’s debates and laugh at its end that shred light of wisdom on many topics.
-
Pat MiddEpstein rulesProfessor Epstein was one of my favorites at Chicago law school. A great legal mind with such a fantastic sense of humor. Keep going!
-
jewls317Happy BirthdayMr. Epstein!, I love listening to you. I should be joining your decade in about 3 years !
-
librarylady87Troy is the best!This is the best (by far) podcast out there! Every episode is fun and chance to learn the details of various subjects. Mainly due to Troy being herding the cats John and Richard!
-
NesornebLaw Talk. Not LegaleseExcellent small c conservative discussion & explanation on law matters! Not to mention witty banter :)
-
jlearIntellectual, interesting and always entertainingI always look forward to hearing their witty banter and hard hitting legal and political analysis. A nutritious intellectual meal finished with humorous dessert.
-
EgStaffordLeak heard round the worldExcellent episode put together on short notice, strong evidence of the erudition and learning of Profs. Epstein and Yoo. Both gentlemen rightly emphasized how this leak is an assault on the Supreme Court, an effort to undermine its issue-focused decision-making procedures and render it into just another political institution driven by the mob of the moment. I note the profound insight of Prof. You regarding the emotion-laden first six pages (not inflammatory language) of the draft opinion versus the dry, citation-laden subsequent pages. Kudos all around!
-
vessel10ExcellentAbsolutely love this podcast. Please please please increase their frequency.
-
easterbunnyclanOne of my favorite podcasts!This truly is one of my favorite podcasts. These guys give me a sigh of relief that, even though my thoughts are contrary to most mainstream news outlets, I am not in fact crazy lone wolf and/or nuts. Thanks Gentlemen!
-
Bull*DurhamI enjoy the show, but ...I just discovered this podcast and liked it so much I immediately started binging. I worked backwards until I got to episode 104. That podcast and all prior don't download at all. Archived maybe? It's interesting to hear what Yoo and Epstein said back when, knowing beforehand how their predictions would turn out! But much of the content is timeless. I hope the podcast lives long, it's a real treat.
-
jaatlasA Worthwhile Podcast (regardless of your views)An excellent podcast on law and the courts. Although I disagree with the hosts on most issues, I find their insights valuable and worthy of some thought. I only wish they would upload more frequently!
-
DivergentBirdNothing I love more than a balanced discussionNothing I love more than a balanced discussion . This was so refreshing and really was so helpful im thankful I found it.
-
Style councelGreat Discussion, Annoying RecordingI like the topics and the conversations. John Yoo sounds like he is wearing the heaviest duty mask. Maybe drop the mask or step back from your mic.
-
531EWA fanYou asked who may listed to your show. Stay at home mom, homeschooling, legally migrant to the US, is whom listens to you. Thank you for the conversation type content.
-
SilverBaerMy favorite PodcastI listen to this podcast all the time when I’m at work mainly to hear a more conservative take on the law as I find myself leaning more to the left. And as a son of a lawyer and someone interested in Politics and Law, I find this professional explanation and breakdown in the political world fascinating. (Also I could listen to Professor Epstein rant about cases for hours😂)
-
AdamPakYes!Episode 153 was outstanding. The podcast is usually very good but this one was better. Very clear explanation of a laundry list of current legal issues, peppered with wit and broader observations about tort law, SCOTUS, and presidential power. More like this!!
-
Chaene12Mansplaining the constitution.Boring and antiquated perspectives. No diversity of thought. Sloppy moral reasoning. Stale & superficial arguments. Sorry I couldn’t give it zero stars.
-
J04nG1660n5True intelligence is knowing what you don’t knowAs a lawyer, I enjoy listening to this podcast and it’s generally quite good. John Yoo and Richard Epstein are both quite conservative but they are also quite smart and it’s fun to compare their reactions to news with the reactions of the (also very smart) hosts of Strict Scrutiny and Divided Argumemt. What I find fascinating though is how Richard Epstein continues to offer his opinions on the effectiveness of various Covid-19 public health measures with such self-confidence when he has been wrong every single step of the way. Google his Covid predictions; he “projected” in March 2020 that only 500 Americans would die from Covid, then revised his “projection” to 5,000 a month later. And yet, 600,000 deaths later, Richard Epstein still acts like he is a public health expert. You’re a very good lawyer and law professor, but have some humility and stay away from things that you are not an expert on.
-
nopealopesaysnopeWhiney and fullThis is just guys complaining. I can tell they are attempting humor, but the level of the humor along with the incessant whining make it impossible to listen long enough to get good info.
-
GaGa love!War CriminalJohn Yoo is a war criminal who has no place in the legal profession.
-
Unlerned HandTo be SavoredFunny, irreverent, instructional, yet respectful of the audience.
-
JanMichaudWay to gain perspectiveThis podcast series is engaging for me as a Libertarian and appreciator of the rule of law. It is an opportunity to hone and add to my scant knowledge gaining more and more interest, knowledge and perspective. Thanks!
-
estburkeA treat!This is a treat— hearing these friends agree, and disagree, without bending themselves out of shape.
-
Nickname333333333Even These Guys Entertain Vote Fraud May Have shakyEpisode 142 - My god Epstein just doesn’t get it. He thinks Trump cares about being the only president impeached twice and he will have that mark on his record. Trump doesn’t care there is no shame, nothing is embarrassing to him, so meaningless sanctions like being twice impeached means nothing to Trump, plus he will simply always say the impeachment’s were improper and he did everything perfect, so there is nothing that shames Trump, and Trump and his supporters will refuse to accept the validity of the impeachment’s. And he thinks there was voting irregularities in the 2020 election. In law school my Torts professor was also the Dean of my law school was a big proponent of Epstein’s teachings, but after listening to Epstein’s comments in this episode and his continued belief that norms that Trump has ignored for 4 years actually did constrain Trump in any way, he just doesn’t get it, the rule of law and norms and practices works because the collective give it meaning, but if someone like Trump refuses to be restrained and refused to accept law, then it is being naive to the think this system worked and did anything to check Trump.
-
aAngela CrossLove this show.Such helpful information. If only there was this quality of discourse in more places.
-
JimNorCalBrilliant, educational banter.I could listen to Richard Epstein forever. What a gifted talker! The words flow like water but with the insight and sparkle of wine. John Yoo is a solid spox for traditional America. An intellectual banquet.
-
TJMan49Great Podcast, but this episode was annoying.This podcast is always filed with great information, and the back and forth between two legal scholars is illuminating. However, I found the latest episode, “Judging Amy” to be uncharacteristically annoying—not in content, but style. What was up with John Yoo? He constantly interrupted and over-talked Richard. Thankfully, Richard was too polite to return the rudeness. Troy please tell John to eat one fewer McRibs before the next one.
-
mross1776Great podcastI love these two—three actually if you include Senik. John Yoo is a trip! Quite the contrast to the Darth Vader like personality the media portrayed him to be during the Bush years.
-
Sparty36Always funnyQuality show
-
jwsteigerwaltRazor sharpTwo incredibly sharp minds.
-
herrforce1Timely & AccessibleI’m not legally trained but want to keep up on current cases beyond the headlines. These guys in their “faculty lounge” always serve up the most relevant discussion with a twist of levity and authenticity. If my undergrad profs had been this relatable maybe I’d have gone into law (maybe it worked out just as well...).
-
Chris from MarylandAwesomeThe boys are simply tremendous
-
Dylan Paul T.WondrousFrench and Isgur are intellectually and comedically stupendous.
-
ptab01Often a treasure of common senseAnd when it is weighted down w/ the particulate of minutiae & permeations - at least they have the good sense to add a chuckle at the gallows.
-
OneCitizenCanCritical Thinking at its Finest!If you want to gather facts and information and educate yourself on important topics of interest and controversy, principals and law, (all of which affect you), the lay person will find this podcast a 12 on a scale of 1-10. You will love the knowledge, perfect amount of humor and banter, and focused discussion, brought to you via the free market and freedom of speech!
-
Salvius JulianusPredictable debatesOccasionally their positions and arguments are surprising but most times you know what they are going to say and why.
-
C..B..JPerfect CommentaryVery knowledgeable guys (who aren’t afraid to disagree) and perfect amount of humor. In many ways this is the next level up to mainstream media. You won’t be disappointed!
-
Beau5375Erudite and wittyWhere can you listen to profs from top unis who are also culinary experts on the McRib?
-
Fast-flyerBest podcast everThe best, most erudite podcast ever. The wit, knowledge and insights demonstrated by these gentlemen is awe inspiring. Let's hear it for Roman law and McRibs.
-
ti2mYoo OutFace it: people tune in to hear Epstein, not Yoo. John Yoo is a good lawyer but he does not approach Epstein’s polymath status. Yoo’s insecure, anti-intellectual taunts and juvenile humor force Epstein to play—uncomfortably for him and the audience—the genial backslapping buddy, but distract from Epstein’s insights. My guess is that’s why most of the audience tunes in.
-
Peter BusscherA fine podcastExcellent content. The intriguing legal analysis of John and Richard is only outdone by their humor. Like other listeners, I wish it were a twice-monthly affair, but I can make do with the current arrangement. Cheers!
-
kevncarlinExcellent, Topical Legal Analysis & CommentaryRichard Epstein is the libertarian law professor who railed against takings before it was fashionable with bon vivant panache. John Yoo is the Justice Department veteran who provided position papers for George W Bush's war on terror, and defies with every breath the vilifiers who would paint him as the embodiment of evil while scarfing down McRibs. Troy Senik is the lion tamer who brings a whip and chair to moderate every session. Enjoy.
Similar Podcasts

The Commentary Magazine Podcast

The Editors

Uncommon Knowledge

The McCarthy Report

Advisory Opinions

GoodFellows: Conversations from the Hoover Institution

Ink Stained Wretches

Cato Daily Podcast

The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast

City Journal's 10 Blocks

3 Martini Lunch

GLoP Culture

The Ricochet Podcast

Libertarian

Power Line
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork on this page are property of the podcast owner, and not endorsed by UP.audio.